UMiDIGI S3 Pro vs Xiaomi Mi 11
Compare Phones: UMiDIGI S3 Pro vs Xiaomi Mi 11
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (174.99 USD vs 339.99 USD)
Better camera (932 points vs 372 points)
Better battery (870 points vs 748 points)
Better connectivity (848 points vs 831 points)
Against:
Worse performance (708 points vs 754 points)
Worse display (628 points vs 996 points)
Worse design (757 points vs 967 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Better video fps (30 fps vs 24 fps)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (19.66 Megapixels vs 20.11 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5150mAh vs 4600mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (900 megahertz vs 840 megahertz)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2100 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.3 inch vs 6.81 inch)
Lower pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 515 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (83.4 percents vs 91.65 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better performance (754 points vs 708 points)
Better display (996 points vs 628 points)
Better design (967 points vs 757 points)
Against:
Higher price (339.99 USD vs 174.99 USD)
Worse camera (372 points vs 932 points)
Worse battery (748 points vs 870 points)
Worse connectivity (831 points vs 848 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (20.11 Megapixels vs 19.66 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Worse video fps (24 fps vs 30 fps)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4600mAh vs 5150mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2100 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (840 megahertz vs 900 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.81 inch vs 6.3 inches)
Higher pixel density (515 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (91.65 percents vs 83.4 percents)