Huawei Honor 8x vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T
Compare Phones: Huawei Honor 8x vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (202.56 USD vs 216 USD)
Better performance (482 points vs 129 points)
Better design (909 points vs 557 points)
Against:
Worse camera (450 points vs 755 points)
Worse battery (343 points vs 712 points)
Worse connectivity (200 points vs 732 points)
Worse display (682 points vs 685 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Better front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (19.66 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3750mAh vs 5000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More gpu cores (4 cores vs 3 cores)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2400 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (396 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.5 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (84.68 percents vs 83.93 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (755 points vs 450 points)
Better battery (712 points vs 343 points)
Better connectivity (732 points vs 200 points)
Better display (685 points vs 682 points)
Against:
Higher price (216 USD vs 202.56 USD)
Worse performance (129 points vs 482 points)
Worse design (557 points vs 909 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 19.66 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Worse front camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5000mAh vs 3750mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2400 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
Against:
Less gpu cores (3 cores vs 4 cores)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 6.5 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 396 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (83.93 percents vs 84.68 percents)