Oukitel WP1 vs Oukitel Y4800
Compare Phones: Oukitel WP1 vs Oukitel Y4800
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (227.99 USD vs 239.99 USD)
Better battery (773 points vs 375 points)
Against:
Worse camera (315 points vs 674 points)
Worse performance (32 points vs 708 points)
Worse connectivity (113 points vs 391 points)
Worse display (109 points vs 809 points)
Worse design (87 points vs 740 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5000mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2100 megahertz)
Less gpu cores (2 cores vs 3 cores)
Lower gpu frequency (700 megahertz vs 900 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5.5 inch vs 6.3 inch)
Lower pixel density (293 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (65.15 percents vs 83.23 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (674 points vs 315 points)
Better performance (708 points vs 32 points)
Better connectivity (391 points vs 113 points)
Better display (809 points vs 109 points)
Better design (740 points vs 87 points)
Against:
Higher price (239.99 USD vs 227.99 USD)
Worse battery (375 points vs 773 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4000mAh vs 5000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2100 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
More gpu cores (3 cores vs 2 cores)
Higher gpu frequency (900 megahertz vs 700 megahertz)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.3 inch vs 5.5 inches)
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 293 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.23 percents vs 65.15 percents)