OnePlus 5T vs UMiDIGI F2
Compare Phones: OnePlus 5T vs UMiDIGI F2
Summary |
|
For:
Better performance (806 points vs 710 points)
Better display (673 points vs 521 points)
Better design (773 points vs 598 points)
Against:
Higher price (308.7 USD vs 254.99 USD)
Worse camera (648 points vs 914 points)
Worse battery (222 points vs 869 points)
Worse connectivity (897 points vs 956 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3300mAh vs 5150mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2450 megahertz vs 2100 megahertz)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (710 megahertz vs 900 megahertz)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (402 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.01 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (79.88 percents vs 83.12 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (254.99 USD vs 308.7 USD)
Better camera (914 points vs 648 points)
Better battery (869 points vs 222 points)
Better connectivity (956 points vs 897 points)
Against:
Worse performance (710 points vs 806 points)
Worse display (521 points vs 673 points)
Worse design (598 points vs 773 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5150mAh vs 3300mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (900 megahertz vs 710 megahertz)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2100 megahertz vs 2450 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 6.01 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 402 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.12 percents vs 79.88 percents)