OnePlus 5T vs Cubot X50
Compare Phones: OnePlus 5T vs Cubot X50
Summary |
|
For:
Better connectivity (897 points vs 745 points)
Better display (673 points vs 605 points)
Better design (773 points vs 595 points)
Against:
Higher price (308.7 USD vs 281.19 USD)
Worse camera (648 points vs 966 points)
Worse battery (222 points vs 519 points)
Worse performance (806 points vs 871 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 35.95 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3300mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2450 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (710 megahertz vs 800 megahertz)
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (402 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.01 inch vs 6.67 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (79.88 percents vs 84.02 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (281.19 USD vs 308.7 USD)
Better camera (966 points vs 648 points)
Better battery (519 points vs 222 points)
Better performance (871 points vs 806 points)
Against:
Worse connectivity (745 points vs 897 points)
Worse display (605 points vs 673 points)
Worse design (595 points vs 773 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (35.95 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4500mAh vs 3300mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (800 megahertz vs 710 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2450 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 6.01 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 402 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (84.02 percents vs 79.88 percents)