Koolnee K1 vs UMiDIGI F2
Compare Phones: Koolnee K1 vs UMiDIGI F2
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (192.99 USD vs 254.99 USD)
Against:
Worse camera (339 points vs 914 points)
Worse battery (201 points vs 869 points)
Worse performance (333 points vs 710 points)
Worse connectivity (59 points vs 956 points)
Worse display (410 points vs 521 points)
Worse design (416 points vs 598 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.2 vs f/1.7)
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3190mAh vs 5150mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1500 megahertz vs 2100 megahertz)
Less gpu cores (2 cores vs 3 cores)
Lower gpu frequency (650 megahertz vs 900 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (402 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.01 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (80.48 percents vs 83.12 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (914 points vs 339 points)
Better battery (869 points vs 201 points)
Better performance (710 points vs 333 points)
Better connectivity (956 points vs 59 points)
Better display (521 points vs 410 points)
Better design (598 points vs 416 points)
Against:
Higher price (254.99 USD vs 192.99 USD)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2.2)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5150mAh vs 3190mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2100 megahertz vs 1500 megahertz)
More gpu cores (3 cores vs 2 cores)
Higher gpu frequency (900 megahertz vs 650 megahertz)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 6.01 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 402 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.12 percents vs 80.48 percents)