Xiaomi Mi 8 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S

For:

      Better performance (848 points vs 551 points)

      Better connectivity (608 points vs 263 points)

      Better display (791 points vs 775 points)

      Better design (877 points vs 667 points)

Against:

      Higher price (238 USD vs 215 USD)

      Worse camera (585 points vs 681 points)

      Worse battery (254 points vs 857 points)

For:

      Better front camera resolution (19.66 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)

      Worse main camera resolution (12.19 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (3400mAh vs 5020mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2800 megahertz vs 2300 megahertz)

      More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)

Against:

      Lower gpu frequency (710 megahertz vs 750 megahertz)

For:

      Higher pixel density (402 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.21 inch vs 6.67 inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (84.09 percents vs 84.78 percents)

For:

      Lower price (215 USD vs 238 USD)

      Better camera (681 points vs 585 points)

      Better battery (857 points vs 254 points)

Against:

      Worse performance (551 points vs 848 points)

      Worse connectivity (263 points vs 608 points)

      Worse display (775 points vs 791 points)

      Worse design (667 points vs 877 points)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)

      Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.19 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 19.66 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (5020mAh vs 3400mAh)

For:

      Higher gpu frequency (750 megahertz vs 710 megahertz)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2300 megahertz vs 2800 megahertz)

      Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)

For:

      Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 6.21 inches)

Against:

      Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 402 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (84.78 percents vs 84.09 percents)