Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S vs UMiDIGI F1 Play
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S vs UMiDIGI F1 Play
Summary |
|
For:
Better performance (848 points vs 670 points)
Better connectivity (897 points vs 884 points)
Better design (722 points vs 496 points)
Against:
Higher price (411.89 USD vs 279.99 USD)
Worse camera (433 points vs 818 points)
Worse battery (254 points vs 869 points)
Worse display (577 points vs 630 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Worse main camera resolution (12.19 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (5.04 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3400mAh vs 5150mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2800 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (710 megahertz vs 800 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5.99 inch vs 6.3 inch)
Lower pixel density (403 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (82.21 percents vs 83.85 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (279.99 USD vs 411.89 USD)
Better camera (818 points vs 433 points)
Better battery (869 points vs 254 points)
Better display (630 points vs 577 points)
Against:
Worse performance (670 points vs 848 points)
Worse connectivity (884 points vs 897 points)
Worse design (496 points vs 722 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.19 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 5.04 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5150mAh vs 3400mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (800 megahertz vs 710 megahertz)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2800 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.3 inch vs 5.99 inches)
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 403 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.85 percents vs 82.21 percents)