Leagoo S9 vs UMiDIGI Bison GT
Compare Phones: Leagoo S9 vs UMiDIGI Bison GT
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (142.99 USD vs 254 USD)
Better design (445 points vs 232 points)
Against:
Worse camera (405 points vs 924 points)
Worse battery (222 points vs 869 points)
Worse performance (331 points vs 663 points)
Worse connectivity (199 points vs 849 points)
Worse display (164 points vs 775 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.2 vs f/1.8)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 36.11 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3300mAh vs 5150mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1500 megahertz vs 2050 megahertz)
Less gpu cores (2 cores vs 4 cores)
Lower gpu frequency (520 megahertz vs 900 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5.85 inch vs 6.67 inch)
Lower pixel density (286 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (81.79 percents vs 76.7 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (924 points vs 405 points)
Better battery (869 points vs 222 points)
Better performance (663 points vs 331 points)
Better connectivity (849 points vs 199 points)
Better display (775 points vs 164 points)
Against:
Higher price (254 USD vs 142.99 USD)
Worse design (232 points vs 445 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2.2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (36.11 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5150mAh vs 3300mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2050 megahertz vs 1500 megahertz)
More gpu cores (4 cores vs 2 cores)
Higher gpu frequency (900 megahertz vs 520 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 5.85 inches)
Higher pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 286 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (76.7 percents vs 81.79 percents)