AGM X3 vs Realme Q3 Pro 5G
Compare Phones: AGM X3 vs Realme Q3 Pro 5G
Summary |
|
For:
Better performance (848 points vs 780 points)
Better connectivity (608 points vs 581 points)
Against:
Higher price (399.99 USD vs 359.22 USD)
Worse camera (524 points vs 796 points)
Worse battery (508 points vs 644 points)
Worse display (436 points vs 888 points)
Worse design (217 points vs 739 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better front camera resolution (19.66 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.19 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4100mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2800 megahertz vs 2600 megahertz)
Against:
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5.99 inch vs 6.43 inch)
Lower pixel density (403 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (68.05 percents vs 86.2 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (359.22 USD vs 399.99 USD)
Better camera (796 points vs 524 points)
Better battery (644 points vs 508 points)
Better display (888 points vs 436 points)
Better design (739 points vs 217 points)
Against:
Worse performance (780 points vs 848 points)
Worse connectivity (581 points vs 608 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 12.19 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 19.66 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4500mAh vs 4100mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2600 megahertz vs 2800 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.43 inch vs 5.99 inches)
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 403 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (86.2 percents vs 68.05 percents)