Apple iPhone 6 Plus vs Cubot X50
Compare Phones: Apple iPhone 6 Plus vs Cubot X50
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (201.99 USD vs 281.19 USD)
Against:
Worse camera (78 points vs 965 points)
Worse battery (124 points vs 517 points)
Worse performance (107 points vs 870 points)
Worse connectivity (606 points vs 742 points)
Worse display (311 points vs 603 points)
Worse design (389 points vs 592 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Against:
Worse main camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (1.23 Megapixels vs 35.95 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (2915mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More gpu cores (4 cores vs 3 cores)
Against:
Less cpu cores (2 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1400 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Less ram (1024 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (401 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5.5 inch vs 6.67 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (68.02 percents vs 84.02 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (965 points vs 78 points)
Better battery (517 points vs 124 points)
Better performance (870 points vs 107 points)
Better connectivity (742 points vs 606 points)
Better display (603 points vs 311 points)
Better design (592 points vs 389 points)
Against:
Higher price (281.19 USD vs 201.99 USD)
Camera |
|
For:
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (35.95 Megapixels vs 1.23 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4500mAh vs 2915mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 2 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1400 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 1024 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Against:
Less gpu cores (3 cores vs 4 cores)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 5.5 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 401 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (84.02 percents vs 68.02 percents)