Cubot P20 vs Oukitel C15 Pro+

For:

      Better camera (482 points vs 49 points)

      Better battery (308 points vs 126 points)

      Better performance (333 points vs 230 points)

      Better display (440 points vs 99 points)

      Better design (628 points vs 395 points)

Against:

      Higher price (101.49 USD vs 99.99 USD)

For:

      Better aperture (f/2 vs f/2.8)

      Better main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)

      Better front camera resolution (7.98 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (4000mAh vs 3200mAh)

For:

      More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)

      More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)

      More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (1500 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)

      Lower gpu frequency (650 megahertz vs 660 megahertz)

For:

      Bigger display (6.18 inch vs 6.09 inch)

      Higher pixel density (403 pixels per inch vs 232 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (82.11 percents vs 80.83 percents)

For:

      Lower price (99.99 USD vs 101.49 USD)

Against:

      Worse camera (49 points vs 482 points)

      Worse battery (126 points vs 308 points)

      Worse performance (230 points vs 333 points)

      Worse display (99 points vs 440 points)

      Worse design (395 points vs 628 points)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/2.8 vs f/2)

      Worse main camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)

      Worse front camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 7.98 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (3200mAh vs 4000mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1500 megahertz)

      Higher gpu frequency (660 megahertz vs 650 megahertz)

Against:

      Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)

      Less ram (3072 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)

      Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.09 inch vs 6.18 inch)

      Lower pixel density (232 pixels per inch vs 403 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (80.83 percents vs 82.11 percents)