Cubot P20 vs Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
Compare Phones: Cubot P20 vs Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
Summary |
|
For:
Better performance (331 points vs 278 points)
Better design (625 points vs 570 points)
Against:
Higher price (101.49 USD vs 89.99 USD)
Worse camera (479 points vs 700 points)
Worse battery (305 points vs 528 points)
Worse connectivity (67 points vs 285 points)
Worse display (437 points vs 509 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.8)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.98 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4000mAh vs 4520mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1500 megahertz vs 2600 megahertz)
Less gpu cores (2 cores vs 5 cores)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (403 pixels per inch vs 401 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.18 inch vs 6.57 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (82.11 percents vs 84.08 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (89.99 USD vs 101.49 USD)
Better camera (700 points vs 479 points)
Better battery (528 points vs 305 points)
Better connectivity (285 points vs 67 points)
Better display (509 points vs 437 points)
Against:
Worse performance (278 points vs 331 points)
Worse design (570 points vs 625 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 7.98 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4520mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2600 megahertz vs 1500 megahertz)
More gpu cores (5 cores vs 2 cores)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.57 inch vs 6.18 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (401 pixels per inch vs 403 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (84.08 percents vs 82.11 percents)