Xiaomi Mi 6X vs UMiDIGI Power 3
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Mi 6X vs UMiDIGI Power 3
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (168.56 USD vs 199.99 USD)
Better performance (564 points vs 505 points)
Better display (577 points vs 521 points)
Better design (725 points vs 395 points)
Against:
Worse camera (634 points vs 831 points)
Worse battery (178 points vs 947 points)
Worse connectivity (336 points vs 884 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (20.2 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse main camera resolution (12 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3030mAh vs 6150mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (650 megahertz vs 800 megahertz)
Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (403 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5.99 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (77.63 percents vs 83.91 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (831 points vs 634 points)
Better battery (947 points vs 178 points)
Better connectivity (884 points vs 336 points)
Against:
Higher price (199.99 USD vs 168.56 USD)
Worse performance (505 points vs 564 points)
Worse display (521 points vs 577 points)
Worse design (395 points vs 725 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 20.2 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6150mAh vs 3030mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (800 megahertz vs 650 megahertz)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 5.99 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 403 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.91 percents vs 77.63 percents)