UMiDIGI Z2 Pro vs nubia Red Magic 5G
Compare Phones: UMiDIGI Z2 Pro vs nubia Red Magic 5G
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (164 USD vs 589.59 USD)
Better connectivity (849 points vs 788 points)
Better design (816 points vs 473 points)
Against:
Worse camera (587 points vs 954 points)
Worse battery (298 points vs 644 points)
Worse performance (670 points vs 928 points)
Worse display (443 points vs 815 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Better front camera resolution (16.37 Megapixels vs 12.58 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (16.37 Megapixels vs 64 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3550mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (800 megahertz vs 587 megahertz)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (402 pixels per inch vs 388 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.2 inch vs 6.65 inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (85.14 percents vs 82.83 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (954 points vs 587 points)
Better battery (644 points vs 298 points)
Better performance (928 points vs 670 points)
Better display (815 points vs 443 points)
Against:
Higher price (589.59 USD vs 164 USD)
Worse connectivity (788 points vs 849 points)
Worse design (473 points vs 816 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (64 Megapixels vs 16.37 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Worse front camera resolution (12.58 Megapixels vs 16.37 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4500mAh vs 3550mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (587 megahertz vs 800 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.65 inch vs 6.2 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (388 pixels per inch vs 402 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (82.83 percents vs 85.14 percents)