UMiDIGI Z2 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T

For:

      Better performance (670 points vs 475 points)

      Better connectivity (849 points vs 515 points)

      Better design (816 points vs 446 points)

Against:

      Higher price (164 USD vs 158 USD)

      Worse camera (587 points vs 766 points)

      Worse battery (298 points vs 900 points)

      Worse display (443 points vs 687 points)

For:

      Better front camera resolution (16.37 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)

      Worse main camera resolution (16.37 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (3550mAh vs 6000mAh)

For:

      More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)

      More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)

Against:

      Lower gpu frequency (800 megahertz vs 950 megahertz)

For:

      Higher pixel density (402 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.2 inch vs 6.53 inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (85.14 percents vs 83.7 percents)

For:

      Lower price (158 USD vs 164 USD)

      Better camera (766 points vs 587 points)

      Better battery (900 points vs 298 points)

      Better display (687 points vs 443 points)

Against:

      Worse performance (475 points vs 670 points)

      Worse connectivity (515 points vs 849 points)

      Worse design (446 points vs 816 points)

For:

      Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)

      Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 16.37 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 16.37 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 3550mAh)

For:

      Higher gpu frequency (950 megahertz vs 800 megahertz)

Against:

      Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)

      Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)

For:

      Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 6.2 inches)

Against:

      Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 402 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (83.7 percents vs 85.14 percents)