UMiDIGI Z2 Pro vs Asus ROG Phone 5

For:

      Lower price (164 USD vs 627.71 USD)

      Better design (816 points vs 488 points)

Against:

      Worse camera (587 points vs 928 points)

      Worse battery (298 points vs 927 points)

      Worse performance (670 points vs 756 points)

      Worse connectivity (849 points vs 971 points)

      Worse display (443 points vs 928 points)

Against:

      Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 2.37 Megapixels)

      Worse main camera resolution (16.37 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)

      Worse front camera resolution (16.37 Megapixels vs 23.79 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (3550mAh vs 6000mAh)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)

      Lower gpu frequency (800 megahertz vs 840 megahertz)

      Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)

For:

      Higher pixel density (402 pixels per inch vs 380 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.2 inch vs 6.78 inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (85.14 percents vs 84.98 percents)

For:

      Better camera (928 points vs 587 points)

      Better battery (927 points vs 298 points)

      Better performance (756 points vs 670 points)

      Better connectivity (971 points vs 849 points)

      Better display (928 points vs 443 points)

Against:

      Higher price (627.71 USD vs 164 USD)

      Worse design (488 points vs 816 points)

For:

      Better video resolution (2.37 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)

      Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 16.37 Megapixels)

      Better front camera resolution (23.79 Megapixels vs 16.37 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 3550mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)

      Higher gpu frequency (840 megahertz vs 800 megahertz)

      More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)

For:

      Bigger display (6.78 inch vs 6.2 inches)

Against:

      Lower pixel density (380 pixels per inch vs 402 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (84.98 percents vs 85.14 percents)