Meizu M6T vs UMiDIGI Bison
Compare Phones: Meizu M6T vs UMiDIGI Bison
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (115.19 USD vs 158 USD)
Better design (363 points vs 201 points)
Against:
Worse camera (383 points vs 815 points)
Worse battery (171 points vs 773 points)
Worse performance (254 points vs 670 points)
Worse connectivity (263 points vs 849 points)
Worse display (128 points vs 630 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.2 vs f/1.7)
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3300mAh vs 5000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1500 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Less gpu cores (2 cores vs 3 cores)
Lower gpu frequency (520 megahertz vs 800 megahertz)
Less ram (3072 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5.7 inch vs 6.3 inch)
Lower pixel density (282 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (75.66 percents vs 75.28 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (815 points vs 383 points)
Better battery (773 points vs 171 points)
Better performance (670 points vs 254 points)
Better connectivity (849 points vs 263 points)
Better display (630 points vs 128 points)
Against:
Higher price (158 USD vs 115.19 USD)
Worse design (201 points vs 363 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2.2)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5000mAh vs 3300mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1500 megahertz)
More gpu cores (3 cores vs 2 cores)
Higher gpu frequency (800 megahertz vs 520 megahertz)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.3 inch vs 5.7 inches)
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 282 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (75.28 percents vs 75.66 percents)