Lenovo Z5 vs Cubot X50
Compare Phones: Lenovo Z5 vs Cubot X50
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (193.62 USD vs 281.19 USD)
Better design (809 points vs 595 points)
Against:
Worse camera (514 points vs 966 points)
Worse battery (222 points vs 519 points)
Worse performance (631 points vs 871 points)
Worse connectivity (395 points vs 745 points)
Worse display (541 points vs 605 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 35.95 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3300mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1800 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (402 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.2 inch vs 6.67 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (83.95 percents vs 84.02 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (966 points vs 514 points)
Better battery (519 points vs 222 points)
Better performance (871 points vs 631 points)
Better connectivity (745 points vs 395 points)
Better display (605 points vs 541 points)
Against:
Higher price (281.19 USD vs 193.62 USD)
Worse design (595 points vs 809 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (35.95 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4500mAh vs 3300mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1800 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 6.2 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 402 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (84.02 percents vs 83.95 percents)