Asus ROG Phone vs Xiaomi Mi CC9 Pro
Compare Phones: Asus ROG Phone vs Xiaomi Mi CC9 Pro
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (398.99 USD vs 539 USD)
Better performance (978 points vs 698 points)
Better connectivity (841 points vs 391 points)
Against:
Worse camera (365 points vs 997 points)
Worse battery (375 points vs 890 points)
Worse display (664 points vs 876 points)
Worse design (384 points vs 559 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.6)
Worse main camera resolution (12 Megapixels vs 108.58 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4000mAh vs 5260mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2960 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (402 pixels per inch vs 398 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6 inch vs 6.47 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (77.05 percents vs 88.05 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (997 points vs 365 points)
Better battery (890 points vs 375 points)
Better display (876 points vs 664 points)
Better design (559 points vs 384 points)
Against:
Higher price (539 USD vs 398.99 USD)
Worse performance (698 points vs 978 points)
Worse connectivity (391 points vs 841 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.6 vs f/1.8)
Better main camera resolution (108.58 Megapixels vs 12 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5260mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2960 megahertz)
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.47 inch vs 6 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (398 pixels per inch vs 402 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (88.05 percents vs 77.05 percents)