Xiaomi Mi A2 vs UMiDIGI Bison GT

For:

      Lower price (132 USD vs 254 USD)

      Better design (725 points vs 232 points)

Against:

      Worse camera (633 points vs 924 points)

      Worse battery (169 points vs 869 points)

      Worse performance (564 points vs 663 points)

      Worse connectivity (435 points vs 849 points)

      Worse display (577 points vs 775 points)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)

Against:

      Worse main camera resolution (12 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)

      Worse front camera resolution (20.11 Megapixels vs 36.11 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (3010mAh vs 5150mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2050 megahertz)

Against:

      Lower gpu frequency (650 megahertz vs 900 megahertz)

      Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)

      Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)

For:

      Higher pixel density (403 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display (5.99 inch vs 6.67 inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (77.63 percents vs 76.7 percents)

For:

      Better camera (924 points vs 633 points)

      Better battery (869 points vs 169 points)

      Better performance (663 points vs 564 points)

      Better connectivity (849 points vs 435 points)

      Better display (775 points vs 577 points)

Against:

      Higher price (254 USD vs 132 USD)

      Worse design (232 points vs 725 points)

For:

      Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 12 Megapixels)

      Better front camera resolution (36.11 Megapixels vs 20.11 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)

For:

      Better battery capacity (5150mAh vs 3010mAh)

For:

      Higher gpu frequency (900 megahertz vs 650 megahertz)

      More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)

      More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2050 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)

For:

      Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 5.99 inches)

Against:

      Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 403 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (76.7 percents vs 77.63 percents)