Nokia 6.1 Plus vs UMiDIGI A9 Pro
Compare Phones: Nokia 6.1 Plus vs UMiDIGI A9 Pro
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (135.99 USD vs 148.19 USD)
Against:
Worse camera (543 points vs 813 points)
Worse battery (179 points vs 531 points)
Worse performance (423 points vs 501 points)
Worse connectivity (391 points vs 848 points)
Worse display (465 points vs 628 points)
Worse design (421 points vs 569 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.7)
Worse main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3060mAh vs 4150mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1800 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (435 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5.8 inch vs 6.3 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (80.62 percents vs 82.23 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (813 points vs 543 points)
Better battery (531 points vs 179 points)
Better performance (501 points vs 423 points)
Better connectivity (848 points vs 391 points)
Better display (628 points vs 465 points)
Better design (569 points vs 421 points)
Against:
Higher price (148.19 USD vs 135.99 USD)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4150mAh vs 3060mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1800 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.3 inch vs 5.8 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 435 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (82.23 percents vs 80.62 percents)