Meizu 16 vs Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite

For:

      Better performance (848 points vs 687 points)

      Better design (867 points vs 735 points)

Against:

      Higher price (335.85 USD vs 251 USD)

      Worse camera (604 points vs 941 points)

      Worse battery (100 points vs 494 points)

      Worse connectivity (395 points vs 476 points)

      Worse display (506 points vs 855 points)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)

      Worse main camera resolution (12.19 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)

      Worse front camera resolution (19.66 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (3010mAh vs 4030mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2800 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)

      Higher gpu frequency (710 megahertz vs 500 megahertz)

Against:

      Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)

Against:

      Smaller display (6 inch vs 6.39 inch)

      Lower pixel density (402 pixels per inch vs 403 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (84.6 percents vs 86.08 percents)

For:

      Lower price (251 USD vs 335.85 USD)

      Better camera (941 points vs 604 points)

      Better battery (494 points vs 100 points)

      Better connectivity (476 points vs 395 points)

      Better display (855 points vs 506 points)

Against:

      Worse performance (687 points vs 848 points)

      Worse design (735 points vs 867 points)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)

      Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.19 Megapixels)

      Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 19.66 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (4030mAh vs 3010mAh)

For:

      More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2800 megahertz)

      Lower gpu frequency (500 megahertz vs 710 megahertz)

For:

      Bigger display (6.39 inch vs 6 inches)

      Higher pixel density (403 pixels per inch vs 402 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (86.08 percents vs 84.6 percents)