Oukitel WP2 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Compare Phones: Oukitel WP2 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Summary |
|
For:
Better battery (983 points vs 519 points)
Against:
Higher price (274.99 USD vs 212.82 USD)
Worse camera (410 points vs 963 points)
Worse performance (333 points vs 481 points)
Worse connectivity (67 points vs 373 points)
Worse display (459 points vs 687 points)
Worse design (79 points vs 634 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 64.14 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 20.11 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (10000mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1500 megahertz vs 2050 megahertz)
Less gpu cores (2 cores vs 4 cores)
Lower gpu frequency (650 megahertz vs 800 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (402 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (61.87 percents vs 85.19 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (212.82 USD vs 274.99 USD)
Better camera (963 points vs 410 points)
Better performance (481 points vs 333 points)
Better connectivity (373 points vs 67 points)
Better display (687 points vs 459 points)
Better design (634 points vs 79 points)
Against:
Worse battery (519 points vs 983 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (64.14 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (20.11 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4500mAh vs 10000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2050 megahertz vs 1500 megahertz)
More gpu cores (4 cores vs 2 cores)
Higher gpu frequency (800 megahertz vs 650 megahertz)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 6 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 402 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (85.19 percents vs 61.87 percents)