Huawei Mate 20 vs Xiaomi Redmi K30 Pro

For:

      Lower price (425.68 USD vs 443.6 USD)

      Better connectivity (805 points vs 395 points)

      Better design (888 points vs 729 points)

Against:

      Worse camera (527 points vs 980 points)

      Worse battery (377 points vs 758 points)

      Worse performance (577 points vs 832 points)

      Worse display (654 points vs 937 points)

For:

      Better front camera resolution (23.79 Megapixels vs 19.7 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)

      Worse main camera resolution (11.81 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (4000mAh vs 4700mAh)

For:

      Higher gpu frequency (720 megahertz vs 587 megahertz)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2600 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)

      Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.53 inch vs 6.67 inch)

      Lower pixel density (381 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (88.31 percents vs 87.52 percents)

For:

      Better camera (980 points vs 527 points)

      Better battery (758 points vs 377 points)

      Better performance (832 points vs 577 points)

      Better display (937 points vs 654 points)

Against:

      Higher price (443.6 USD vs 425.68 USD)

      Worse connectivity (395 points vs 805 points)

      Worse design (729 points vs 888 points)

For:

      Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)

      Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 11.81 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse front camera resolution (19.7 Megapixels vs 23.79 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (4700mAh vs 4000mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2600 megahertz)

      More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)

Against:

      Lower gpu frequency (587 megahertz vs 720 megahertz)

For:

      Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 6.53 inches)

      Higher pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 381 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (87.52 percents vs 88.31 percents)