Huawei Mate 20 vs Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite

For:

      Better connectivity (803 points vs 473 points)

      Better design (887 points vs 559 points)

Against:

      Higher price (425.68 USD vs 317 USD)

      Worse camera (524 points vs 978 points)

      Worse battery (375 points vs 890 points)

      Worse performance (573 points vs 698 points)

      Worse display (653 points vs 876 points)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.6)

      Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)

      Worse main camera resolution (11.81 Megapixels vs 64.44 Megapixels)

      Worse front camera resolution (23.79 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (4000mAh vs 5260mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2600 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)

      More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)

Against:

      Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)

For:

      Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 6.47 inch)

Against:

      Lower pixel density (381 pixels per inch vs 398 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (88.31 percents vs 88.05 percents)

For:

      Lower price (317 USD vs 425.68 USD)

      Better camera (978 points vs 524 points)

      Better battery (890 points vs 375 points)

      Better performance (698 points vs 573 points)

      Better display (876 points vs 653 points)

Against:

      Worse connectivity (473 points vs 803 points)

      Worse design (559 points vs 887 points)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.6 vs f/1.8)

      Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)

      Better main camera resolution (64.44 Megapixels vs 11.81 Megapixels)

      Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 23.79 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (5260mAh vs 4000mAh)

For:

      More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2600 megahertz)

      Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)

For:

      Higher pixel density (398 pixels per inch vs 381 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.47 inch vs 6.53 inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (88.05 percents vs 88.31 percents)