Huawei Mate 20 vs Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite

For:

      Better connectivity (805 points vs 476 points)

      Better design (888 points vs 562 points)

Against:

      Higher price (425.68 USD vs 317 USD)

      Worse camera (527 points vs 978 points)

      Worse battery (377 points vs 890 points)

      Worse performance (577 points vs 700 points)

      Worse display (654 points vs 877 points)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.6)

      Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)

      Worse main camera resolution (11.81 Megapixels vs 64.44 Megapixels)

      Worse front camera resolution (23.79 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (4000mAh vs 5260mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2600 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)

      More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)

Against:

      Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)

For:

      Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 6.47 inch)

Against:

      Lower pixel density (381 pixels per inch vs 398 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (88.31 percents vs 88.05 percents)

For:

      Lower price (317 USD vs 425.68 USD)

      Better camera (978 points vs 527 points)

      Better battery (890 points vs 377 points)

      Better performance (700 points vs 577 points)

      Better display (877 points vs 654 points)

Against:

      Worse connectivity (476 points vs 805 points)

      Worse design (562 points vs 888 points)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.6 vs f/1.8)

      Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)

      Better main camera resolution (64.44 Megapixels vs 11.81 Megapixels)

      Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 23.79 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (5260mAh vs 4000mAh)

For:

      More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2600 megahertz)

      Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)

For:

      Higher pixel density (398 pixels per inch vs 381 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.47 inch vs 6.53 inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (88.05 percents vs 88.31 percents)