Huawei Mate 20 vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G

For:

      Better performance (577 points vs 534 points)

Against:

      Higher price (425.68 USD vs 408.99 USD)

      Worse camera (527 points vs 832 points)

      Worse battery (377 points vs 580 points)

      Worse connectivity (805 points vs 832 points)

      Worse display (654 points vs 910 points)

      Worse design (888 points vs 994 points)

For:

      Better video fps (30 fps vs 24 fps)

      Better front camera resolution (23.79 Megapixels vs 20.11 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)

      Worse main camera resolution (11.81 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (4000mAh vs 4250mAh)

For:

      Higher gpu frequency (720 megahertz vs 490 megahertz)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2600 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)

      Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.53 inch vs 6.55 inch)

      Lower pixel density (381 pixels per inch vs 402 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (88.31 percents vs 85.49 percents)

For:

      Lower price (408.99 USD vs 425.68 USD)

      Better camera (832 points vs 527 points)

      Better battery (580 points vs 377 points)

      Better connectivity (832 points vs 805 points)

      Better display (910 points vs 654 points)

      Better design (994 points vs 888 points)

Against:

      Worse performance (534 points vs 577 points)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)

      Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 11.81 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse video fps (24 fps vs 30 fps)

      Worse front camera resolution (20.11 Megapixels vs 23.79 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (4250mAh vs 4000mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2600 megahertz)

      More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)

Against:

      Lower gpu frequency (490 megahertz vs 720 megahertz)

For:

      Bigger display (6.55 inch vs 6.53 inches)

      Higher pixel density (402 pixels per inch vs 381 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (85.49 percents vs 88.31 percents)