Apple iPhone XR vs OnePlus 7 Pro
Compare Phones: Apple iPhone XR vs OnePlus 7 Pro
Summary |
|
For:
Better connectivity (958 points vs 947 points)
Against:
Higher price (972.79 USD vs 603.69 USD)
Worse camera (121 points vs 888 points)
Worse battery (67 points vs 377 points)
Worse performance (148 points vs 818 points)
Worse display (298 points vs 987 points)
Worse design (568 points vs 849 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.6)
Worse main camera resolution (12.19 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.15 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (2942mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (6 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (2500 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Less ram (3072 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.1 inch vs 6.67 inch)
Lower pixel density (324 pixels per inch vs 515 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (80.28 percents vs 88.78 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (603.69 USD vs 972.79 USD)
Better camera (888 points vs 121 points)
Better battery (377 points vs 67 points)
Better performance (818 points vs 148 points)
Better display (987 points vs 298 points)
Better design (849 points vs 568 points)
Against:
Worse connectivity (947 points vs 958 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.6 vs f/1.8)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.19 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 7.15 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4000mAh vs 2942mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 6 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2500 megahertz)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 6.1 inches)
Higher pixel density (515 pixels per inch vs 324 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (88.78 percents vs 80.28 percents)