Huawei Mate 20 Pro vs POCO F2 Pro

For:

      Lower price (462.67 USD vs 550 USD)

      Better connectivity (805 points vs 204 points)

      Better display (963 points vs 937 points)

Against:

      Worse camera (846 points vs 971 points)

      Worse battery (545 points vs 758 points)

      Worse performance (791 points vs 832 points)

      Worse design (785 points vs 788 points)

For:

      Better video fps (30 fps vs 24 fps)

      Better front camera resolution (23.79 Megapixels vs 20 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)

      Worse main camera resolution (39.92 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (4200mAh vs 4700mAh)

For:

      Higher gpu frequency (720 megahertz vs 587 megahertz)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2600 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)

For:

      Higher pixel density (538 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.39 inch vs 6.67 inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (88.14 percents vs 87.52 percents)

For:

      Better camera (971 points vs 846 points)

      Better battery (758 points vs 545 points)

      Better performance (832 points vs 791 points)

      Better design (788 points vs 785 points)

Against:

      Higher price (550 USD vs 462.67 USD)

      Worse connectivity (204 points vs 805 points)

      Worse display (937 points vs 963 points)

For:

      Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)

      Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 39.92 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse video fps (24 fps vs 30 fps)

      Worse front camera resolution (20 Megapixels vs 23.79 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (4700mAh vs 4200mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2600 megahertz)

Against:

      Lower gpu frequency (587 megahertz vs 720 megahertz)

For:

      Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 6.39 inches)

Against:

      Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 538 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (87.52 percents vs 88.14 percents)