Huawei Mate 20 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 9

For:

      Lower price (462.67 USD vs 499.85 USD)

      Better performance (791 points vs 650 points)

      Better display (963 points vs 630 points)

      Better design (785 points vs 132 points)

Against:

      Worse camera (846 points vs 864 points)

      Worse battery (545 points vs 961 points)

      Worse connectivity (805 points vs 927 points)

For:

      Better front camera resolution (23.79 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)

      Worse main camera resolution (39.92 Megapixels vs 64.44 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (4200mAh vs 6600mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2600 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)

Against:

      Lower gpu frequency (720 megahertz vs 970 megahertz)

      Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)

For:

      Bigger display (6.39 inch vs 6.3 inch)

      Higher pixel density (538 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (88.14 percents vs 70.87 percents)

For:

      Better camera (864 points vs 846 points)

      Better battery (961 points vs 545 points)

      Better connectivity (927 points vs 805 points)

Against:

      Higher price (499.85 USD vs 462.67 USD)

      Worse performance (650 points vs 791 points)

      Worse display (630 points vs 963 points)

      Worse design (132 points vs 785 points)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)

      Better main camera resolution (64.44 Megapixels vs 39.92 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 23.79 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (6600mAh vs 4200mAh)

For:

      Higher gpu frequency (970 megahertz vs 720 megahertz)

      More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2600 megahertz)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.3 inch vs 6.39 inch)

      Lower pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 538 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (70.87 percents vs 88.14 percents)