Huawei Honor Magic 2 vs UMiDIGI F2
Compare Phones: Huawei Honor Magic 2 vs UMiDIGI F2
Summary |
|
For:
Better performance (791 points vs 710 points)
Better display (855 points vs 521 points)
Better design (786 points vs 598 points)
Against:
Higher price (445.59 USD vs 254.99 USD)
Worse camera (564 points vs 914 points)
Worse battery (280 points vs 869 points)
Worse connectivity (670 points vs 956 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Worse main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3500mAh vs 5150mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2600 megahertz vs 2100 megahertz)
More gpu cores (10 cores vs 3 cores)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (720 megahertz vs 900 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (403 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.39 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (85.08 percents vs 83.12 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (254.99 USD vs 445.59 USD)
Better camera (914 points vs 564 points)
Better battery (869 points vs 280 points)
Better connectivity (956 points vs 670 points)
Against:
Worse performance (710 points vs 791 points)
Worse display (521 points vs 855 points)
Worse design (598 points vs 786 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5150mAh vs 3500mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (900 megahertz vs 720 megahertz)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2100 megahertz vs 2600 megahertz)
Less gpu cores (3 cores vs 10 cores)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 6.39 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 403 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (83.12 percents vs 85.08 percents)