UMiDIGI F1 vs Xiaomi Redmi 7
Compare Phones: UMiDIGI F1 vs Xiaomi Redmi 7
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (572 points vs 145 points)
Better battery (869 points vs 377 points)
Better performance (505 points vs 227 points)
Better connectivity (884 points vs 395 points)
Better display (630 points vs 340 points)
Against:
Higher price (191 USD vs 120 USD)
Worse design (496 points vs 506 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2.2)
Better main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 12.19 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5150mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1800 megahertz)
More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 2048 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.3 inch vs 6.26 inch)
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 269 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.85 percents vs 81.79 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (120 USD vs 191 USD)
Better design (506 points vs 496 points)
Against:
Worse camera (145 points vs 572 points)
Worse battery (377 points vs 869 points)
Worse performance (227 points vs 505 points)
Worse connectivity (395 points vs 884 points)
Worse display (340 points vs 630 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.2 vs f/1.7)
Worse main camera resolution (12.19 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4000mAh vs 5150mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1800 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Less ram (2048 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.26 inch vs 6.3 inch)
Lower pixel density (269 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (81.79 percents vs 83.85 percents)