UMiDIGI F1 vs Huawei Enjoy 9e
Compare Phones: UMiDIGI F1 vs Huawei Enjoy 9e
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (572 points vs 182 points)
Better battery (869 points vs 172 points)
Better performance (505 points vs 326 points)
Better connectivity (884 points vs 250 points)
Better display (630 points vs 185 points)
Against:
Higher price (191 USD vs 164.62 USD)
Worse design (496 points vs 509 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Better main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5150mAh vs 3020mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (800 megahertz vs 680 megahertz)
More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2300 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.3 inch vs 6.09 inch)
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 282 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.85 percents vs 79.52 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (164.62 USD vs 191 USD)
Better design (509 points vs 496 points)
Against:
Worse camera (182 points vs 572 points)
Worse battery (172 points vs 869 points)
Worse performance (326 points vs 505 points)
Worse connectivity (250 points vs 884 points)
Worse display (185 points vs 630 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3020mAh vs 5150mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2300 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (680 megahertz vs 800 megahertz)
Less ram (3072 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.09 inch vs 6.3 inch)
Lower pixel density (282 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (79.52 percents vs 83.85 percents)