UMiDIGI Z Pro vs Doogee N40 Pro
Compare Phones: UMiDIGI Z Pro vs Doogee N40 Pro
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (528 points vs 223 points)
Better display (342 points vs 297 points)
Against:
Higher price (289.99 USD vs 183.49 USD)
Worse battery (275 points vs 957 points)
Worse performance (572 points vs 667 points)
Worse connectivity (54 points vs 130 points)
Worse design (310 points vs 357 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/2 vs f/2.2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse front camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3780mAh vs 6380mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (10 cores vs 8 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2600 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
More gpu cores (4 cores vs 3 cores)
Higher gpu frequency (875 megahertz vs 800 megahertz)
Against:
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (401 pixels per inch vs 272 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5.5 inch vs 6.52 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (71.48 percents vs 81.66 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (183.49 USD vs 289.99 USD)
Better battery (957 points vs 275 points)
Better performance (667 points vs 572 points)
Better connectivity (130 points vs 54 points)
Better design (357 points vs 310 points)
Against:
Worse camera (223 points vs 528 points)
Worse display (297 points vs 342 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.2 vs f/2)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6380mAh vs 3780mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Against:
Less cpu cores (8 cores vs 10 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2600 megahertz)
Less gpu cores (3 cores vs 4 cores)
Lower gpu frequency (800 megahertz vs 875 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.52 inch vs 5.5 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (272 pixels per inch vs 401 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (81.66 percents vs 71.48 percents)