Cubot Quest Lite vs Doogee Y9 Plus
Compare Phones: Cubot Quest Lite vs Doogee Y9 Plus
Summary |
|
Against:
Higher price (116.99 USD vs 107.99 USD)
Worse camera (175 points vs 557 points)
Worse battery (82 points vs 613 points)
Worse performance (159 points vs 389 points)
Worse display (46 points vs 595 points)
Worse design (166 points vs 628 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.2 vs f/2)
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3000mAh vs 4350mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Less ram (2048 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5 inch vs 6.3 inch)
Lower pixel density (294 pixels per inch vs 400 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (61.49 percents vs 81.09 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (107.99 USD vs 116.99 USD)
Better camera (557 points vs 175 points)
Better battery (613 points vs 82 points)
Better performance (389 points vs 159 points)
Better display (595 points vs 46 points)
Better design (628 points vs 166 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/2 vs f/2.2)
Better main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4350mAh vs 3000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 2048 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.3 inch vs 5 inches)
Higher pixel density (400 pixels per inch vs 294 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (81.09 percents vs 61.49 percents)