UMiDIGI F1 Play vs Oukitel K9
Compare Phones: UMiDIGI F1 Play vs Oukitel K9
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (818 points vs 512 points)
Better performance (670 points vs 443 points)
Better connectivity (884 points vs 515 points)
Against:
Higher price (279.99 USD vs 278.99 USD)
Worse battery (869 points vs 927 points)
Worse display (630 points vs 819 points)
Worse design (496 points vs 745 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (5150mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (800 megahertz vs 680 megahertz)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2300 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 350 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.3 inch vs 7.12 inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.85 percents vs 83.66 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (278.99 USD vs 279.99 USD)
Better battery (927 points vs 869 points)
Better display (819 points vs 630 points)
Better design (745 points vs 496 points)
Against:
Worse camera (512 points vs 818 points)
Worse performance (443 points vs 670 points)
Worse connectivity (515 points vs 884 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Worse main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 5150mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2300 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (680 megahertz vs 800 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (7.12 inch vs 6.3 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (350 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (83.66 percents vs 83.85 percents)