UMiDIGI F1 Play vs Cubot X50
Compare Phones: UMiDIGI F1 Play vs Cubot X50
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (279.99 USD vs 281.19 USD)
Better battery (869 points vs 519 points)
Better connectivity (884 points vs 745 points)
Better display (630 points vs 605 points)
Against:
Worse camera (818 points vs 966 points)
Worse performance (670 points vs 871 points)
Worse design (496 points vs 595 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 35.95 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5150mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.3 inch vs 6.67 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (83.85 percents vs 84.02 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (966 points vs 818 points)
Better performance (871 points vs 670 points)
Better design (595 points vs 496 points)
Against:
Higher price (281.19 USD vs 279.99 USD)
Worse battery (519 points vs 869 points)
Worse connectivity (745 points vs 884 points)
Worse display (605 points vs 630 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (35.95 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4500mAh vs 5150mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 6.3 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (84.02 percents vs 83.85 percents)