UMiDIGI F1 Play vs Honor Play 5T
Compare Phones: UMiDIGI F1 Play vs Honor Play 5T
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (818 points vs 165 points)
Better battery (869 points vs 773 points)
Better performance (670 points vs 646 points)
Better connectivity (884 points vs 310 points)
Better display (630 points vs 264 points)
Against:
Higher price (279.99 USD vs 226.89 USD)
Worse design (496 points vs 505 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5150mAh vs 5000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1800 megahertz)
More gpu cores (3 cores vs 2 cores)
Higher gpu frequency (800 megahertz vs 614 megahertz)
Against:
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 269 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.3 inch vs 6.52 inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.85 percents vs 82.8 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (226.89 USD vs 279.99 USD)
Better design (505 points vs 496 points)
Against:
Worse camera (165 points vs 818 points)
Worse battery (773 points vs 869 points)
Worse performance (646 points vs 670 points)
Worse connectivity (310 points vs 884 points)
Worse display (264 points vs 630 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (5000mAh vs 5150mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1800 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Less gpu cores (2 cores vs 3 cores)
Lower gpu frequency (614 megahertz vs 800 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.52 inch vs 6.3 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (269 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (82.8 percents vs 83.85 percents)