Nomu M8 vs UMiDIGI Bison GT
Compare Phones: Nomu M8 vs UMiDIGI Bison GT
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (139 USD vs 254 USD)
Against:
Worse camera (442 points vs 924 points)
Worse battery (132 points vs 869 points)
Worse performance (333 points vs 663 points)
Worse connectivity (336 points vs 849 points)
Worse display (73 points vs 775 points)
Worse design (188 points vs 232 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.8)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (21.46 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (21.46 Megapixels vs 36.11 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (2950mAh vs 5150mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1500 megahertz vs 2050 megahertz)
Less gpu cores (2 cores vs 4 cores)
Lower gpu frequency (650 megahertz vs 900 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5.2 inch vs 6.67 inch)
Lower pixel density (282 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (66.34 percents vs 76.7 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (924 points vs 442 points)
Better battery (869 points vs 132 points)
Better performance (663 points vs 333 points)
Better connectivity (849 points vs 336 points)
Better display (775 points vs 73 points)
Better design (232 points vs 188 points)
Against:
Higher price (254 USD vs 139 USD)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 21.46 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (36.11 Megapixels vs 21.46 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5150mAh vs 2950mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2050 megahertz vs 1500 megahertz)
More gpu cores (4 cores vs 2 cores)
Higher gpu frequency (900 megahertz vs 650 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 5.2 inches)
Higher pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 282 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (76.7 percents vs 66.34 percents)