Motorola One Vision vs UMiDIGI F2
Compare Phones: Motorola One Vision vs UMiDIGI F2
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (209.99 USD vs 254.99 USD)
Better display (568 points vs 521 points)
Against:
Worse camera (803 points vs 914 points)
Worse battery (202 points vs 869 points)
Worse performance (440 points vs 710 points)
Worse connectivity (702 points vs 956 points)
Worse design (577 points vs 598 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse front camera resolution (24.84 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3500mAh vs 5150mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2100 megahertz)
Against:
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (435 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.3 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (81.59 percents vs 83.12 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (914 points vs 803 points)
Better battery (869 points vs 202 points)
Better performance (710 points vs 440 points)
Better connectivity (956 points vs 702 points)
Better design (598 points vs 577 points)
Against:
Higher price (254.99 USD vs 209.99 USD)
Worse display (521 points vs 568 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 24.84 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5150mAh vs 3500mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2100 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 6.3 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 435 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.12 percents vs 81.59 percents)