UMiDIGI Power vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Compare Phones: UMiDIGI Power vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (175.99 USD vs 182.99 USD)
Better battery (870 points vs 742 points)
Better performance (438 points vs 166 points)
Better connectivity (699 points vs 259 points)
Against:
Worse camera (556 points vs 796 points)
Worse display (628 points vs 685 points)
Worse design (463 points vs 575 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5150mAh vs 5020mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2300 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (680 megahertz vs 1000 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.3 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (83.57 percents vs 83.81 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (796 points vs 556 points)
Better display (685 points vs 628 points)
Better design (575 points vs 463 points)
Against:
Higher price (182.99 USD vs 175.99 USD)
Worse battery (742 points vs 870 points)
Worse performance (166 points vs 438 points)
Worse connectivity (259 points vs 699 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse front camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (5020mAh vs 5150mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (1000 megahertz vs 680 megahertz)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2300 megahertz)
Less ram (3072 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 6.3 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.81 percents vs 83.57 percents)