UMiDIGI Power vs Xiaomi Redmi 9

For:

      Better camera (558 points vs 222 points)

      Better battery (869 points vs 743 points)

      Better performance (443 points vs 166 points)

      Better connectivity (702 points vs 515 points)

Against:

      Higher price (175.99 USD vs 122 USD)

      Worse display (630 points vs 687 points)

      Worse design (468 points vs 485 points)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2.2)

      Better main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)

      Better front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (5150mAh vs 5020mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2300 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)

      More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)

      More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)

Against:

      Lower gpu frequency (680 megahertz vs 950 megahertz)

For:

      Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.3 inch vs 6.53 inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (83.57 percents vs 83.49 percents)

For:

      Lower price (122 USD vs 175.99 USD)

      Better display (687 points vs 630 points)

      Better design (485 points vs 468 points)

Against:

      Worse camera (222 points vs 558 points)

      Worse battery (743 points vs 869 points)

      Worse performance (166 points vs 443 points)

      Worse connectivity (515 points vs 702 points)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/2.2 vs f/1.8)

      Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)

      Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (5020mAh vs 5150mAh)

For:

      Higher gpu frequency (950 megahertz vs 680 megahertz)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2300 megahertz)

      Less ram (3072 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)

      Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)

For:

      Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 6.3 inches)

Against:

      Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (83.49 percents vs 83.57 percents)