UMiDIGI Power vs Doogee N20 Pro
Compare Phones: UMiDIGI Power vs Doogee N20 Pro
Summary |
|
For:
Better battery (869 points vs 624 points)
Better connectivity (702 points vs 67 points)
Better display (630 points vs 595 points)
Better design (468 points vs 459 points)
Against:
Higher price (175.99 USD vs 153.99 USD)
Worse camera (558 points vs 593 points)
Worse performance (443 points vs 670 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5150mAh vs 4400mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2300 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (680 megahertz vs 800 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 400 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.57 percents vs 81.06 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (153.99 USD vs 175.99 USD)
Better camera (593 points vs 558 points)
Better performance (670 points vs 443 points)
Against:
Worse battery (624 points vs 869 points)
Worse connectivity (67 points vs 702 points)
Worse display (595 points vs 630 points)
Worse design (459 points vs 468 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.8)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4400mAh vs 5150mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (800 megahertz vs 680 megahertz)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2300 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Lower pixel density (400 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (81.06 percents vs 83.57 percents)