Oppo A9 vs POCO M3 Pro 5G
Compare Phones: Oppo A9 vs POCO M3 Pro 5G
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (222 USD vs 239.43 USD)
Better performance (531 points vs 260 points)
Better design (828 points vs 535 points)
Against:
Worse camera (359 points vs 761 points)
Worse battery (485 points vs 712 points)
Worse connectivity (391 points vs 676 points)
Worse display (518 points vs 711 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Worse main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4020mAh vs 5000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More gpu cores (3 cores vs 2 cores)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2100 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (900 megahertz vs 955 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 6.5 inch)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 405 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (85.18 percents vs 83.94 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (761 points vs 359 points)
Better battery (712 points vs 485 points)
Better connectivity (676 points vs 391 points)
Better display (711 points vs 518 points)
Against:
Higher price (239.43 USD vs 222 USD)
Worse performance (260 points vs 531 points)
Worse design (535 points vs 828 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5000mAh vs 4020mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2100 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (955 megahertz vs 900 megahertz)
Against:
Less gpu cores (2 cores vs 3 cores)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (405 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.5 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (83.94 percents vs 85.18 percents)