Oukitel Y4800 vs Nokia 2720 Flip
Compare Phones: Oukitel Y4800 vs Nokia 2720 Flip
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (677 points vs 4 points)
Better battery (377 points vs 4 points)
Better performance (710 points vs 92 points)
Better connectivity (395 points vs 176 points)
Better design (742 points vs 34 points)
Against:
Higher price (239.99 USD vs 169.99 USD)
Camera |
|
For:
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 2.06 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4000mAh vs 1500mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 2 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2100 megahertz vs 1100 megahertz)
More cpu bits (64 bits vs 32 bits)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 512 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.3 inch vs 2.8 inch)
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 143 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.23 percents vs 23.19 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (169.99 USD vs 239.99 USD)
Against:
Worse camera (4 points vs 677 points)
Worse battery (4 points vs 377 points)
Worse performance (92 points vs 710 points)
Worse connectivity (176 points vs 395 points)
Worse design (34 points vs 742 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse main camera resolution (2.06 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (1500mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (2 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1100 megahertz vs 2100 megahertz)
Less cpu bits (32 bits vs 64 bits)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Less rom (512 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (2.8 inch vs 6.3 inch)
Lower pixel density (143 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (23.19 percents vs 83.23 percents)