Xiaomi Mi 9T vs Ulefone Armor 3W

For:

      Lower price (347 USD vs 412.49 USD)

      Better camera (848 points vs 581 points)

      Better display (855 points vs 428 points)

      Better design (706 points vs 63 points)

Against:

      Worse battery (377 points vs 994 points)

      Worse performance (706 points vs 710 points)

      Worse connectivity (476 points vs 923 points)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)

      Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)

      Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 21.16 Megapixels)

      Better front camera resolution (20.11 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (4000mAh vs 10300mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2100 megahertz)

For:

      Bigger display (6.39 inch vs 5.7 inch)

Against:

      Lower pixel density (403 pixels per inch vs 424 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (86.37 percents vs 64.45 percents)

For:

      Better battery (994 points vs 377 points)

      Better performance (710 points vs 706 points)

      Better connectivity (923 points vs 476 points)

Against:

      Higher price (412.49 USD vs 347 USD)

      Worse camera (581 points vs 848 points)

      Worse display (428 points vs 855 points)

      Worse design (63 points vs 706 points)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)

      Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)

      Worse main camera resolution (21.16 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)

      Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 20.11 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (10300mAh vs 4000mAh)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2100 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)

For:

      Higher pixel density (424 pixels per inch vs 403 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display (5.7 inch vs 6.39 inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (64.45 percents vs 86.37 percents)