Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro vs Xiaomi Mi CC9 Pro

For:

      Lower price (364 USD vs 539 USD)

      Better performance (818 points vs 700 points)

      Better connectivity (476 points vs 395 points)

      Better design (706 points vs 562 points)

Against:

      Worse camera (848 points vs 997 points)

      Worse battery (377 points vs 890 points)

      Worse display (855 points vs 877 points)

For:

      Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.6)

      Worse main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 108.58 Megapixels)

      Worse front camera resolution (20.11 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (4000mAh vs 5260mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)

For:

      Higher pixel density (403 pixels per inch vs 398 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.39 inch vs 6.47 inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (86.37 percents vs 88.05 percents)

For:

      Better camera (997 points vs 848 points)

      Better battery (890 points vs 377 points)

      Better display (877 points vs 855 points)

Against:

      Higher price (539 USD vs 364 USD)

      Worse performance (700 points vs 818 points)

      Worse connectivity (395 points vs 476 points)

      Worse design (562 points vs 706 points)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.6 vs f/1.7)

      Better main camera resolution (108.58 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)

      Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 20.11 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)

For:

      Better battery capacity (5260mAh vs 4000mAh)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)

For:

      Bigger display (6.47 inch vs 6.39 inches)

Against:

      Lower pixel density (398 pixels per inch vs 403 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (88.05 percents vs 86.37 percents)