Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro vs Huawei nova 6 5G
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro vs Huawei nova 6 5G
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (364 USD vs 500.26 USD)
Better camera (848 points vs 805 points)
Better display (855 points vs 735 points)
Better design (706 points vs 633 points)
Against:
Worse battery (377 points vs 545 points)
Worse performance (818 points vs 921 points)
Worse connectivity (476 points vs 737 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 39.92 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse front camera resolution (20.11 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4000mAh vs 4200mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2860 megahertz)
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (403 pixels per inch vs 401 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.39 inch vs 6.57 inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (86.37 percents vs 84.78 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better battery (545 points vs 377 points)
Better performance (921 points vs 818 points)
Better connectivity (737 points vs 476 points)
Against:
Higher price (500.26 USD vs 364 USD)
Worse camera (805 points vs 848 points)
Worse display (735 points vs 855 points)
Worse design (633 points vs 706 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 20.11 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Worse main camera resolution (39.92 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4200mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2860 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.57 inch vs 6.39 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (401 pixels per inch vs 403 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (84.78 percents vs 86.37 percents)