Cubot X20 Pro vs UMiDIGI Power 3
Compare Phones: Cubot X20 Pro vs UMiDIGI Power 3
Summary |
|
For:
Better performance (670 points vs 505 points)
Better design (772 points vs 395 points)
Against:
Higher price (204.99 USD vs 199.99 USD)
Worse camera (468 points vs 831 points)
Worse battery (308 points vs 947 points)
Worse connectivity (135 points vs 884 points)
Worse display (485 points vs 521 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse main camera resolution (11.81 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4000mAh vs 6150mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.3 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (83.4 percents vs 83.91 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (199.99 USD vs 204.99 USD)
Better camera (831 points vs 468 points)
Better battery (947 points vs 308 points)
Better connectivity (884 points vs 135 points)
Better display (521 points vs 485 points)
Against:
Worse performance (505 points vs 670 points)
Worse design (395 points vs 772 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 11.81 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6150mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 6.3 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.91 percents vs 83.4 percents)