Xiaomi Redmi 8 vs UMiDIGI Bison GT
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Redmi 8 vs UMiDIGI Bison GT
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (119 USD vs 254 USD)
Better design (374 points vs 232 points)
Against:
Worse camera (298 points vs 924 points)
Worse battery (773 points vs 869 points)
Worse performance (277 points vs 663 points)
Worse connectivity (204 points vs 849 points)
Worse display (290 points vs 775 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.19 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 36.11 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (5000mAh vs 5150mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1950 megahertz vs 2050 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (650 megahertz vs 900 megahertz)
Less ram (3072 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.22 inch vs 6.67 inch)
Lower pixel density (270 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (82.1 percents vs 76.7 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (924 points vs 298 points)
Better battery (869 points vs 773 points)
Better performance (663 points vs 277 points)
Better connectivity (849 points vs 204 points)
Better display (775 points vs 290 points)
Against:
Higher price (254 USD vs 119 USD)
Worse design (232 points vs 374 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 12.19 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (36.11 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5150mAh vs 5000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2050 megahertz vs 1950 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (900 megahertz vs 650 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 6.22 inches)
Higher pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 270 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (76.7 percents vs 82.1 percents)